<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for NoviceNotes™  · Web Design and Web App Development, SOA, Microsoft Windows, Linux (i.e. Ubuntu [Debian] + Fedora), Software Review, Commentary, and Entertainment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://novicenotes.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://novicenotes.com</link>
	<description>Apache CSS HTML JavaScript Linux MySQL NCR&#039;s PHP Unicode Windows, and SEO as the ridiculous title demonstrates.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 07:31:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on AP = Anything&#039;s Possible by NoviceNotes™</title>
		<link>http://novicenotes.com/2011/08/26/ap-anythings-possible_welcome-anthony-petro/comment-page-1/#comment-27558</link>
		<dc:creator>NoviceNotes™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://novicenotes.com/?p=888#comment-27558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[also problematic of zbench: the uPrev (as req&#039;s / req&#039;d updating) does not function properly; all nicey nice, as for example, it functions well w/ NN_Carrington [etc.]

Here. Let&#039;s try &quot;Suffusion&quot; for a while. The dick should use /my/ Common Fonts tool (see elaborate Theme-specific controls [re: Suffusion], but i couldn&#039;t find any means of contacting him / her.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also problematic of zbench: the uPrev (as req&#8217;s / req&#8217;d updating) does not function properly; all nicey nice, as for example, it functions well w/ NN_Carrington [etc.]</p>
<p>Here. Let&#8217;s try &#8220;Suffusion&#8221; for a while. The dick should use /my/ Common Fonts tool (see elaborate Theme-specific controls [re: Suffusion], but i couldn&#8217;t find any means of contacting him / her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AP = Anything&#039;s Possible by NoviceNotes™</title>
		<link>http://novicenotes.com/2011/08/26/ap-anythings-possible_welcome-anthony-petro/comment-page-1/#comment-27557</link>
		<dc:creator>NoviceNotes™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 05:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://novicenotes.com/?p=888#comment-27557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh! great, that&#039;s right: here, we get all italics for some reason! ugh. i&#039;m going to explode my head!

dude... i ... i just don&#039;t know... haha
but, &lt;em&gt;open for &lt;strong&gt;suggestions&lt;/strong&gt;!&lt;/em&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh! great, that&#8217;s right: here, we get all italics for some reason! ugh. i&#8217;m going to explode my head!</p>
<p>dude&#8230; i &#8230; i just don&#8217;t know&#8230; haha<br />
but, <em>open for <strong>suggestions</strong>!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AP = Anything&#039;s Possible by NoviceNotes™</title>
		<link>http://novicenotes.com/2011/08/26/ap-anythings-possible_welcome-anthony-petro/comment-page-1/#comment-27556</link>
		<dc:creator>NoviceNotes™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 05:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://novicenotes.com/?p=888#comment-27556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do believe i&#039;ll never be satisfied! Oh! Grrr... actually, no, i know i do like that zdesk or whatever it&#039;s called, but-- for example-- look at how crap the &#x3c;code&#x3e; blocks appear, here, vs as you might recall from that previous theme. It&#039;s theming nonsense, i tell you! It&#039;s NON-SENSE! ugh!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do believe i&#8217;ll never be satisfied! Oh! Grrr&#8230; actually, no, i know i do like that zdesk or whatever it&#8217;s called, but&#8211; for example&#8211; look at how crap the &#x3c;code&#x3e; blocks appear, here, vs as you might recall from that previous theme. It&#8217;s theming nonsense, i tell you! It&#8217;s NON-SENSE! ugh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Standard US Keyboard: Quick Reference by NoviceNotes.Net</title>
		<link>http://novicenotes.com/2009/11/09/the-standard-us-keyboard-quick-reference/comment-page-1/#comment-26141</link>
		<dc:creator>NoviceNotes.Net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://novicenotes.com/?p=343#comment-26141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div class=&quot;attn&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;bold serif&quot;&gt;WARNING:&lt;/span&gt; I believe the comment (further below) has been posted by a &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bots&quot; title=&quot;Wikipedia on Bots&quot; target=&quot;wikionbots&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bot&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;. I&#039;ve left it here, for purposes of Education, only. The following meta data was also reported by the &lt;em&gt;alleged respondent&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li title=&quot;Reported by Google as distributor of Malware&quot;&gt;ksourcerer.org/Education/&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li title=&quot;email address as provided by respondent&quot;&gt;linux&#x40;ksourcerer.org&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li title=&quot;NOTE that the ASKIMET SPAM control plugin DID NOT preselect this as JUNK&quot;&gt;IP Address (recorded by WordPress): 174.132.126.226&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em class=&quot;smaller serif&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Note:&lt;/strong&gt; IP address is not reliable forensic evidence as it is too easy to spoof&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Consider the abbreviated, all-too-general use of the &lt;em&gt;WordPress blog title&lt;/em&gt; element, instead of a definitive article reference. &lt;span class=&quot;smallcaps bold italic&quot;&gt;Moreover&lt;/span&gt;, consider the following concern, regarding &lt;strong&gt;the statistical analysis of malware distribution&lt;/strong&gt;, (presumably) performed by the extensive technology afforded to the public, through &lt;em&gt;Google™&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;Google Safebrowsing&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=ksourcerer.org/&amp;hl=en-us&quot; target=&quot;GoogleSRpt&quot; title=&quot;Click for Google Stats of Suspicious Data related to respondent ksourcerer.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Diagnostic Report: ksourcerer.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; [alleged comment author, this topic, submitted: 2010/01/10 at 9:36am ] The value of the href RE: Google Safebrowsing should direct the reader to the following location:&lt;br /&gt; &lt;pre&gt;http://google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=ksourcerer.org/&amp;hl=en-us&lt;/pre&gt;

Please read the Google Safebrowsing report thoroughly. It is important to understand that the respondent (i.e. the comment posted below), and the data submitted by the respondent may not represent the same party, or individual. &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Specifically&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;, in this case &lt;span class=&quot;smallcaps&quot;&gt;ksourcerer&#x2e;org&lt;/span&gt;,  could be &lt;em&gt;completely unaware&lt;/em&gt; of the reports of malicious software / activity associated with the domain (i.e. as reported by the Google stats). 

Note: Unless you are certain of the contrary, then the following is probably true. You agreed to allow &lt;strong class=&quot;serif smallcaps&quot;&gt;Google Safebrowsing&lt;/strong&gt; to monitor your activity-- &lt;em&gt;allegedly&lt;/em&gt;-- for the purpose of your own protection (i.e. don&#039;t run with scissors! Don&#039;t leave the lid up! Put the cap back on!). When you use &lt;em&gt;Mozilla Firefox™&lt;/em&gt; and, of course, Google Chrome™, (unless configured, specifically otherwise) your activity is monitored as the title suggests to keep you &lt;em&gt;safe&lt;/em&gt; so, if it catches you doing something silly-- as to load a URL-- which you shouldn&#039;t, an intervention occurs. Typically, when the user engages in dangerous browsing, and is thus is halted,  Google Safebrowsing integration offers options. The user may heed the recommendation of &lt;em&gt;Google Safebrowsing&lt;/em&gt; on intervention, as acting judge &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; jury in the case of the questionable URL, yet the user is ultimately allowed to proceed to the URL in question (e.g. on intervention, the user is presented with the statistical analysis of a suspicious URL, at which time he or she must decide either to &lt;em&gt;return to the previous page&lt;/em&gt;, or proceed to the URL, at his or her will, against the discretion of Google Safebrowsing™).

&lt;div class=&quot;bottomsmaller&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;bold serif smallcaps&quot;&gt;What did I do?:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;br /&gt;I have neither knowledge of the URL, nor any credible recommendation suggesting I visit the location. The warning was enough to prevent me from further investigation. I will not subject my network client software to ksourcerer&#x2e;org until i am 100% confident that there is first a reason to do so. Secondarily, because of the statistical analysis of Google Safebrowsing (rather slanderous, I suppose), I will continue to consider the web site to be unsafe; that my system my be subject to malicious software, spyware, or even worse-- on infection-- to become an unknowing agent; a so-called mule; an aide in the general propagation of illicit activities by allowing my system to be transformed into a node for maintenance of someone&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botnet&quot; title=&quot;what is a botnet&quot; target=&quot;wikibotnet&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;botnet&lt;/a&gt;. 

&lt;strong&gt;Reader&lt;/strong&gt;, you &lt;em&gt;must&lt;/em&gt; &lt;strong&gt;educate yourself&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;make your own decision&lt;/strong&gt; in this, and any similar circumstance, please. We must improve our casual browsing habits if we are to reverse the negative impact of spammers, malware distributors, and others who may (or may not know) they are involved in the propagation of such activity. 

Be proactive to maintain the security of your own system, always be on the defensive when on &lt;em&gt;the Network&lt;/em&gt; (i.e. the Internet / the WWW), and trust no one. Make it your rule of thumb, and maybe-- someday-- everyone will find a more pleasant on-line experience.

Please don&#039;t hesitate to add your own commentary on this (and other matters discussed at NoviceNotes™), especially if yours is not congruent with mine-- for it is often the contrary opinion which helps everyone to gain the most clear understanding of the situation at large. Readers, and contributors, I sincerely thank you. 

Sincerely,
-JS (Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.NoviceNotes.com&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; title=&quot;NoviceNotes™&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NoviceNotes™&lt;/a&gt; &#124; NoviceNotes.Net )

JS&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="attn">
<p><span class="bold serif">WARNING:</span> I believe the comment (further below) has been posted by a <strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bots" title="Wikipedia on Bots" target="wikionbots" rel="nofollow">bot</a></strong>. I&#8217;ve left it here, for purposes of Education, only. The following meta data was also reported by the <em>alleged respondent</em>.</p>
<ol>
<li title="Reported by Google as distributor of Malware">ksourcerer.org/Education/</li>
<li title="email address as provided by respondent">linux&#x40;ksourcerer.org</li>
<li title="NOTE that the ASKIMET SPAM control plugin DID NOT preselect this as JUNK">IP Address (recorded by WordPress): 174.132.126.226<br /><em class="smaller serif"><strong>Note:</strong> IP address is not reliable forensic evidence as it is too easy to spoof</em></li>
</ol>
<p>Consider the abbreviated, all-too-general use of the <em>WordPress blog title</em> element, instead of a definitive article reference. <span class="smallcaps bold italic">Moreover</span>, consider the following concern, regarding <strong>the statistical analysis of malware distribution</strong>, (presumably) performed by the extensive technology afforded to the public, through <em>Google™</em>.</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Google Safebrowsing</strong> <em><a href="http://google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=ksourcerer.org/&#038;hl=en-us" target="GoogleSRpt" title="Click for Google Stats of Suspicious Data related to respondent ksourcerer.org" rel="nofollow">Diagnostic Report: ksourcerer.org</a></em> [alleged comment author, this topic, submitted: 2010/01/10 at 9:36am ] The value of the href RE: Google Safebrowsing should direct the reader to the following location:<br /> 
<pre><a href="http://google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=ksourcerer.org/&#038;hl=en-us" rel="nofollow">http://google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=ksourcerer.org/&#038;hl=en-us</a></pre>
<p>Please read the Google Safebrowsing report thoroughly. It is important to understand that the respondent (i.e. the comment posted below), and the data submitted by the respondent may not represent the same party, or individual. <strong><em>Specifically</em></strong>, in this case <span class="smallcaps">ksourcerer&#x2e;org</span>,  could be <em>completely unaware</em> of the reports of malicious software / activity associated with the domain (i.e. as reported by the Google stats). </p>
<p>Note: Unless you are certain of the contrary, then the following is probably true. You agreed to allow <strong class="serif smallcaps">Google Safebrowsing</strong> to monitor your activity&#8211; <em>allegedly</em>&#8211; for the purpose of your own protection (i.e. don&#8217;t run with scissors! Don&#8217;t leave the lid up! Put the cap back on!). When you use <em>Mozilla Firefox™</em> and, of course, Google Chrome™, (unless configured, specifically otherwise) your activity is monitored as the title suggests to keep you <em>safe</em> so, if it catches you doing something silly&#8211; as to load a URL&#8211; which you shouldn&#8217;t, an intervention occurs. Typically, when the user engages in dangerous browsing, and is thus is halted,  Google Safebrowsing integration offers options. The user may heed the recommendation of <em>Google Safebrowsing</em> on intervention, as acting judge <em>and</em> jury in the case of the questionable URL, yet the user is ultimately allowed to proceed to the URL in question (e.g. on intervention, the user is presented with the statistical analysis of a suspicious URL, at which time he or she must decide either to <em>return to the previous page</em>, or proceed to the URL, at his or her will, against the discretion of Google Safebrowsing™).</p>
<div class="bottomsmaller"><span class="bold serif smallcaps">What did I do?:</span> <br />I have neither knowledge of the URL, nor any credible recommendation suggesting I visit the location. The warning was enough to prevent me from further investigation. I will not subject my network client software to ksourcerer&#x2e;org until i am 100% confident that there is first a reason to do so. Secondarily, because of the statistical analysis of Google Safebrowsing (rather slanderous, I suppose), I will continue to consider the web site to be unsafe; that my system my be subject to malicious software, spyware, or even worse&#8211; on infection&#8211; to become an unknowing agent; a so-called mule; an aide in the general propagation of illicit activities by allowing my system to be transformed into a node for maintenance of someone&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botnet" title="what is a botnet" target="wikibotnet" rel="nofollow">botnet</a>. </p>
<p><strong>Reader</strong>, you <em>must</em> <strong>educate yourself</strong>, and <strong>make your own decision</strong> in this, and any similar circumstance, please. We must improve our casual browsing habits if we are to reverse the negative impact of spammers, malware distributors, and others who may (or may not know) they are involved in the propagation of such activity. </p>
<p>Be proactive to maintain the security of your own system, always be on the defensive when on <em>the Network</em> (i.e. the Internet / the WWW), and trust no one. Make it your rule of thumb, and maybe&#8211; someday&#8211; everyone will find a more pleasant on-line experience.</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t hesitate to add your own commentary on this (and other matters discussed at NoviceNotes™), especially if yours is not congruent with mine&#8211; for it is often the contrary opinion which helps everyone to gain the most clear understanding of the situation at large. Readers, and contributors, I sincerely thank you. </p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
-JS (Author: <a href="http://www.NoviceNotes.com" target="_top" title="NoviceNotes™" rel="nofollow">NoviceNotes™</a> | NoviceNotes.Net )</p>
<p>JS</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Standard US Keyboard: Quick Reference by ksourcerer.org(an allegedly infected URL - please read)</title>
		<link>http://novicenotes.com/2009/11/09/the-standard-us-keyboard-quick-reference/comment-page-1/#comment-26125</link>
		<dc:creator>ksourcerer.org(an allegedly infected URL - please read)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://novicenotes.com/?p=343#comment-26125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[linux software...

Your post on Learn How-to Develop Web Apps plus Entertainment Software and ... was interesting....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>linux software&#8230;</p>
<p>Your post on Learn How-to Develop Web Apps plus Entertainment Software and &#8230; was interesting&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
